|
© May 9, 2001 by
Bernie L. Gillespie All Rights Reserved.
What is the true “plan of salvation”? Is this plan something God
follows, or is it what He requires of us? Do we follow it as a joint project
along with God? Is the plan of salvation the entire cosmic design which God laid
out before time and then followed in order to Redeem Mankind? Or, is it the one,
two or three steps of response we are required to make in order to “apply”
salvation to our personal lives? Is the plan a progressive series of eras in
human history in which one is saved by obeying all the truth they know? Do we
“carry out” the plan of salvation or did Jesus Christ fulfill it alone? Is it a
plan “of” salvation, or is it the plan “for” salvation? Does the plan of
salvation come to the believer in installments: First, the simple Gospel and
then a more “full Gospel”? These questions came to mind after reading Jim Yohe’s
statement about the plan of salvation:
His death, burial,
and resurrection typified the forthcoming plan of salvation preached by Peter on
the Day of Pentecost: “Repent (death), and be baptized (burial) everyone of you
in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the
gift of the Holy Ghost (resurrection)” (Acts 2:38).”2
This United Pentecostal Church minister submits that the “plan of
salvation” comes AFTER Jesus’ death burial and resurrection. He claims that when
Jesus died, was buried and rose again, it “typified” the “forthcoming
plan of salvation preached by Peter on the Day of Pentecost.” “Forthcoming,”
means that it had not come yet. In other words, Jesus’ death, burial and
resurrection were not the “plan” of salvation. For Yohe, the “plan” is
the three steps of Acts 2:38: Repent, be baptized, and receive the Spirit. Rev.
Yohe holds this view because it is the standard teaching of the UPCI. For
example, a prominent teacher in UPCI history, S. G. Norris, stated in reference
to Acts 2:38: “Thus, the Book of Acts consistently presents the same keys – the
same plan of salvation.”3
This plan of salvation is called the only plan and the “true gospel:”
This apostolic
pattern – faith, repentance, water baptism, and infilling of the Holy Spirit –
is still the pattern of salvation for us today. There is no other plan of
salvation, no other true gospel.4Aflame
Press), p. 3.
This historically and theologically unique interpretation of the
“plan of salvation” lies at the heart of the UPCI’s doctrinal identity. It is
the issue which predominated and defined the 1945 merger which formed the UPCI:
These men had been
ministers in their respective organizations for many years. They knew,
therefore, that the main problem to be worked out concerned the fundamental
doctrine of the proposed new organization. It was brought out in chapters seven
and eight that both the Pentecostal Assemblies of Jesus Christ and the
Pentecostal Church, Incorporated believed in repentance, water baptism in the
name of Jesus Christ, and receiving the Holy Ghost with the initial sign of
speaking with other tongues. To be a minister in either organization, one must
have obeyed these gospel precepts, and must teach and preach them. But in
general, the two groups differed in the spiritual significance attached to each
of these “steps” in the plan of salvation. The vast majority of the ministers in
the Pentecostal Assemblies of Jesus Christ believed that water baptism in Jesus’
name remitted sins and was the birth of the water. They further believed that
the baptism of the Holy Ghost was the birth of the Spirit. The belief of some in
the Pentecostal Church, Incorporated was identical with this. Others, however,
believed that the word “for” in Acts 2:38 meant “because of,” and that one was
baptized because his sins had been remitted, through the efficacy of Jesus’ shed
blood, at the time of repentance. The Pentecostal Church, Incorporated had
accepted ministers who believed either way, seeking to keep the unity of the
Spirit until they all came into the unity of the faith. So it is easy to see
that before a merger could be effected, there must be a fundamental doctrine
relative to the plan of salvation that ministers in both groups could
conscientiously accept.5
However, the major question here is not concerning the unique way
that the UPCI interprets these three elements separately [we’ve addressed that
elsewhere; [cp. “Hearts Purified By Faith”6;
“How Did Paul ‘Wash Away’ His Sins?”7;
“Remission of Sins in Acts 2:38"8;
“How Many Stages?”9;
“What Does it Mean to be ‘Born Again’? ”10.
It is that they see them as THE plan of salvation. Ostensibly for Yohe, Jesus’
work is not even part of the plan (which I am sure he did not intend). According
to his statement, the plan of salvation - Acts 2:38 - was not known until it was
preached by Peter on Pentecost Day. Instead of a plan which Jesus followed and
fulfilled, it was a plan to be followed by those who heard Peter preach. It
pertains more to what they had to do to be saved, than to what
Christ did to save them. The UPCI views the plan of salvation as what one
must obey in order to be saved:
There are several
things man must do in order to be saved. He must hear the gospel preached, he
must repent, he must believe, he must obey God’s Word, and he must be baptized
in Jesus’ name.11
It is this writer’s conviction that the Bible teaches that the plan
of salvation is all about God and what He has done to save His people. It
is not about the sinner’s response. The Scriptures present the plan with a
stress on what God has done. Yes, the Bible speaks strongly that the sinner must
respond with repentance and faith. Nevertheless, what we must do is not the
chief Scriptural accent. The Bible’s call to repentance and faith are consumed
with the magnificence of God’s sovereignty and grace in salvation. The focus is
not on repentance, nor is it on faith. The Bible's emphasis is on the object of
that faith. The focus is on Christ. Faith is the way the believer looks at
Christ. Whereas, the UPCI places great stress on one’s obedience to Acts 2:38 as
the plan of salvation, the Gospel places the stress on Christ’s obedience in
fulfilling God’s plan on the Cross and through the Resurrection. There are a
number of reasons why the UPCI position is wrongly focused. We will address some
of those reasons in the next pages.
Confounding the Gospel
The “plan of salvation” is a phrase that is frequently used by
certain Christian groups in referring to the “steps12Bold
in quotes mine.,”
“keys13(John
11:25 NKJV).,”
or “stages” “How Many Stages?”14
a person must follow in order to be saved. It is a confounding of what Jesus did
with what we must do. Is it biblically and theologically correct to speak of the
Christian’s response as a “plan” of salvation? I do not believe it is. It is not
the way the biblical writers speak about salvation. Paul states emphatically
that the Gospel is Jesus’ own death, burial and resurrection (1 Cor. 15:1-4).
Rather than what God requires of us, the Gospel is what Jesus has already
done for us. Since the Gospel is so clearly stated by Paul in 1
Corinthians 15, it is hard to see how anyone can redefine it.15
Therefore, the corruption of the Gospel must come by how the believer
“applies” it. This is exactly what happens with certain groups when they add
to the Gospel by saying one must apply the Gospel by obedience to “something,”
rather than simply believing God for what He has done in Jesus Christ. This
confounding happens too often among Evangelicals as well as other Christian
groups:
The expression “God’s
eternal plan of salvation” is often used in gospel tracts to refer to three or
four things God wants the sinner to do in order to be saved, such as: (1)
“Acknowledge that you are a sinner and need to be saved,” (2) “Believe that
Jesus died on the cross for sinners,” (3) “Ask God to forgive you of your sins,”
(4) “Put your trust in Jesus.” While these are things which the sinner must
surely do in order to be saved, they hardly constitute the content of God’s
“eternal plan of salvation.” And it is only a debased level of theological
awareness, but one quite current in our day, that would suggest that it is. What
the expression more properly designates is “the order of decrees” in the mind of
God (Eph. 3:11).16
In the case of the UPCI, faith in the biblical Gospel is confounded
by their unique interpretation of Acts 2:38 as the plan of salvation.
The Purpose of God
Interestingly, the word “plan” is not found in the King James
Version of the Bible. The word “purpose” is used instead. Often, when “plan” is
used in other translations it refers to human “schemes”rather than those of God.
The words that best parallel the idea of “plan” in the New Testament are found
in these verses:
Acts 4:28 They did
what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen. NIV
Romans 8:29 For those
God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his
Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. NIV
Romans 8:30 And those
he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those
he justified, he also glorified. NIV
1 Corinthians 2:7 No,
we speak of God's secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God
destined for our glory before time began. NIV
Ephesians 1:5 he
predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance
with his pleasure and will-- NIV
Ephesians 1:11 In him
we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan
of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, NIV
As we see, the word “plan” is found in the New International Version
translation of Ephesians 1:11. The word used here for plan (prothesis)
refers to “that which is planned or purposed in advance - 'plan, proposal,
purpose,'”17
and is also found in the following verses, which speak about God’s eternal
purpose or will:
Romans 8:28 And we
know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have
been called according to his purpose. NIV
Ephesians 3:11
according to his eternal purpose which he accomplished in Christ Jesus
our Lord. NIV
2 Timothy 1:9 who has
saved us and called us to a holy life – not because of anything we have done
but because of his own purpose and grace. This grace was given us in
Christ Jesus before the beginning of time, NIV
The word “purpose” is translated from the Greek verb prooridzo,
which means “to come to a decision beforehand - 'to decide beforehand, to
determine ahead of time, to decide upon ahead of time.”18
The truth that God is a personal God assumes the idea of purpose. An eternal God
would have an eternal purpose:
That God acts upon a
plan in all his activities, is already given in Theism. On the establishment of
a personal God, this question is closed. For person means purpose: precisely
what distinguishes a person from a thing is that its modes of action are
purposive, that all it does is directed to an end and proceeds through the
choice of means to that end.19
It would be an
irresponsible if not an irrational God who would create the world and direct its
course of events with no prior plan or purpose behind such activity – or who
would not direct it at all.20
If God is a personal God, as we believe, he therefore has a purpose.
And being God, He, by His very nature, has all power and wisdom to make sure His
purpose or plan is completely carried out.
If we believe in a
personal God, then, and much more if, being Theists, we believe in the immediate
control by this personal God of the world he has made, we must believe in a plan
underlying all that God does, and therefore also in a plan of salvation. The
only question that can arise concerns not the reality but the nature of this
plan.21
Many Christians (as evidenced by the “Openness of God” debate22)
have a severe allergy to the idea of God’s exclusive, sovereign control of the
world. They chafe against the notion of an eternal plan and of Divine decrees.
They cringe at the thought that God has unilaterally ordained specific things
for our lives according to His sovereign will. I have personally heard teachers
who instructed their class not to read from certain passages, such as Romans
chapter nine, because they said it would be too confusing for people to
understand. This thinking has grave implications for one’s knowledge of
Scripture, and ultimately of one’s faith in God. Does this imply that God’s Word
is too confusing for His people? If so, I am compelled to make this strong
response: God has placed in His Word all that is necessary for us to know His
will and be comforted by His salvation. If, then, we claim there are statements
of His foreknowledge, foreordination, and predestination which we should avoid
or neglect, then we usurp God. We suppose that we know more than God. And by
avoiding or neglecting these portions of Scripture, we impugn the very character
of God, because we say He has put things in His Word which are confusing,
unnecessary or detrimental to our understanding. Who are we to tell God that
these inspired passages of His Holy Word are too confusing for the “average”
Christian?
Therefore we must
guard against depriving believers of anything disclosed about predestination in
Scripture, lest we seem either wickedly to defraud them of the blessing of their
God or to accuse and scoff at the Holy Spirit for having published what is in
any way profitable to suppress. . . Whoever, then, heaps odium upon the doctrine
of predestination openly reproaches God, as if he had unadvisedly let slip
something hurtful to the church.23
One of the most tragic developments among a number of Christians is
a hurtful and irrational prejudice against the biblical doctrine of
predestination. Whatever one’s interpretation of predestination may be, all
readers of Scripture must acknowledge that God has placed the idea of
predestination in His Word (Romans 8:29-30; Ephesians 1:5, 1124)
and intended it to bring faith, hope, comfort and security to his children.
Instead, being ignorantly misunderstood, it has fomented a near hostility and
bitter denunciation among unwitting detractors. What is most tragic is that God
intended it for the assurance of salvation for His people, but it is
unskillfully obscured and dismissed by those who find it unsavory to their human
sensibilities.
The Decrees of God
The general idea of a salvation plan in the Bible pertains more to
the idea of the decrees of the one Holy God in eternity, than it does to a
temporal order with which we must comply. The text of Scripture which expresses
this most succinctly is Ephesians 1:9-12:
Having made known
unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath
purposed in himself: That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might
gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which
are on earth; even in him: In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being
predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the
counsel of his own will: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who
first trusted in Christ. (KJV)
This passage contains several words which communicate the idea of a
plan of salvation. In Ephesians, Paul uses words from two Greek word-groups to
express the majestic scope of God’s plan. The first group (thelema; boule)
speaks mostly of God’s “will” or intention and decision. The second group (proginosko;
prothesis; prohoridzo) deals with the notions of foreknowledge,
predestination and plan or purpose, as something set forth before time. The fact
that Paul uses such a complex of words, compacted into a few verses in
Ephesians, reveals the immensity and richness of the subject. Notice that:
the emphasis for Paul is on what God does and not what we must do.
In Ephesians 3:9, the word “will” (qelhma25)
conveys the idea of intention. God has decided to do something. The force of the
word is that God resolved to do something which He will not fail to do. Next, in
the same verse, Paul speaks of God’s “good pleasure” (eudokia26).
This word connotes that which is good in its nature and what God is pleased to
do. That mystery which pleases God is that He will gather together all things in
Christ at the fullness of time. The next word “purposed” (protiqnmi27)
- is that which God sets before Himself to accomplish. It is the goal of God’s
work. He sets before himself a goal or “purpose” toward which He is working.
That which God decides to do, which pleases Him and which He sets before Himself
to accomplish, is called a “plan” (Proqesis).
This plan was formulated within God’s own counsel (Boulh28),
known (proginosko)
by Him before time, and established - “predestined” (proorizo)
by God sovereignly before all created things. The result of all of this is to
bring praise to God’s glorious grace as it is revealed in those who trust in
Christ.
If we are to stay close to the Bible’s way of articulating God’s
salvation “plan,” we should focus more on the prothesis - the
preordination or predetermined plan of God, worked out in and through Christ
Jesus. We should avoid applying it to anything that we do in response to what
God has done. It is never presented in the Bible as a prescription of personal
responses for obtaining personal salvation. It is not a plan “for” salvation, as
is supposed by Yohe’s treatment of Acts 2:38. One could say that our response to
Jesus (such as Acts 2:38) was planned by God. It is true, that by placing faith
in Jesus we do “participate” in God’s plan. But we cannot say that our faith in
Christ is the plan “for” salvation. It is Jesus who actively works to fulfill
the plan, while we passively through faith receive it. We do not receive it by
performing a series of steps. By trusting in Jesus we are, in effect, saying it
is Christ who does the work. That is what saving faith truly means. The plan of
God always refers to those eternal decrees fulfilled in history by God in the
Person and Work of Jesus Christ.
Certainly, all who use the phrase “plan of salvation” are not
referring to a set of steps. It is not wrong to use the phrase “plan of
salvation,” because God does have a plan for saving the lost. The problem comes
with how some define it. Unfortunately, not all who espouse a “plan of
salvation” present it as God’s plan revealed in the Gospel of Christ. There are
several serious mistakes made when the Gospel (the culmination of the true plan
of salvation) is turned into a subordinate pre-figuring type, while the commands
of Acts 2:38, a plan of action that humans must follow, is made the fulfillment
of God’s salvation. It is God himself who carries out the plan of salvation
which he purposed from all eternity. He carries out His plan in and through the
Person and Work of Jesus Christ.
The last
two sections addressing the purpose and decrees of God establish that the
emphasis or focus of God’s plan is on God. This is the truth of sola deo
gloria - all glory to God alone! The plan of God is cosmic in scope
involving Heaven and Hell, angels and Satan, time and eternity, and the whole
course of human history. It is about far more than one person’s individual
response. The focal point is the work of God to give us redemption and not on
what we must do to receive it. It is about the steps God took in his incarnation
– to live, die and live again as our Savior. It is not based on whether or not
we have obeyed certain commands, kept the right procedures, or followed the
correct steps. The cosmic, holy, eternal plan of God is more than a multi-step
instruction sheet for do-it-yourself salvation. It is a mega-story of the
purpose, decrees and consequent mighty acts of God carried out in the Person of
our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.
1Excerpted from: Bernie
L. Gillespie, The True ‘Plan of Salvation,’ (Findlay, OH: In Christ
Alone! Publishing, 2001), pp. 1-13.
2Jim
H. Yohe, “Sign of the Empty Tomb,” The Pentecostal Herald, May 2001, p. 14.
3“The
Keys,” by SGN, Tract # 6119 (Hazelwood, MO: Word Aflame Press), p. 3.
4“The
Biblical Experience of Salvation,” by JLH, Tract # 6150, (Hazelwood, MO:
Word Aflame Press, 1995; original
ed. 1970, Pentecostal Publishing House), pp. 143f.
5Arthur
L. Clanton and Charles Clanton, United We Stand, Jubilee Edition,
(Hazelwood, MO:
11Salvation
– The Key to Eternal Life, (Hazelwood, MO: Word
Aflame Press, 1985), p. 119.
12A
few examples of writers who use the word “steps” in reference to Acts 2:38:
“The first step we should take in the
process of the new birth is repentance.” [J. T. Pugh, How
to Receive the Holy Ghost, (Hazelwood,
MO: Pentecostal Publishing House, 1969), p. 17.];
“Romans 8:28-30 describes five steps in
God’s eternal plan of salvation for fallen mankind:”
[David K. Bernard, The New Birth, p.
333-334.]; “The biblical steps of repentance, water
baptism in the name of Jesus Christ, and the
baptism of the Holy Spirit had long ago faded
from the institutional church, . . .”[David K. Bernard, A
History of Christian Doctrine Vol. 1, p.
274.]; “One of the distinctive positions of Oneness
Pentecostals is that God’s standard of full
salvation for the New Testament church is repentance, water
baptism in the name of Jesus Christ, and
the baptism of the Holy Spirit with the initial sign of speaking in
tongues. The major Oneness groups hold that
this experience is “the New Birth,” although there is some
debate on this issue. While there are
differences between groups and even within groups on the proper
theological characterization of these three steps of faith,
there is agreement that God commands
everyone to obey them. There is also agreement that these steps do
not constitute salvation by works.
Rather, they are applications of the grace of God, purchased by the
blood of Jesus Christ, and they are
expressions of faith in God.” [David K. Bernard, A History of
Christian Doctrine Vol. 3, p. 112-113.]
13On
the front of one Oneness Pentecostal periodical I found this title: “The
First Order Unto Salvation Is The New Birth of
Water and Spirit, St. John 3:5 -- Acts 2:38" followed
by three diagrams. The first was a person
praying with “Conviction Brings Repentance” above
it and “Key No. 1 ‘REPENT’” beneath it. The second
diagram was a baptism with “Repentance Brings
Obedience” above it and “Key No. 2 ‘BAPTISM’”
below it. The third was of a person with raised
hands descended on by a radiant dove. Above it was
“Obedience Brings the Holy Ghost” and below it was
“Key No. 3 ‘THE HOLY GHOST.’” This perfectly
illustrates the distortion that occurs when Acts
2:38 is made to be the “plan of salvation.” The
elements of Acts 2:38 are viewed as keys which unlock
the door of salvation. Rather than faith in
what Christ has done, the obedient follower of Acts 2:38
possesses the real means of “opening the
door” to salvation. Nevertheless, Jesus said, “I am the door.”
(John 10:9). A few verses later he states:
“He that believes in me, though he may die, yet shall he live.”
14http://www.inchristalone.org/HowManyStages.htm
15Lee
Strobel, in his book The Case for Christ, (pp. 229-230) states that
such Evangelical scholars as Gary Habermas, William Lane Craig, and Craig
Bloomberg “are convinced that this passage is a creed of the 14Lee Strobel,
in his book The Case for Christ, (pp. 229-230) states that such
Evangelical scholars as Gary Habermas, William Lane Craig, and Craig
Bloomberg “are convinced that this passage is a creed of the early church
and not just the words” that originated with the Apostle Paul.Habermas
informs, “The eminent scholar Joachim Jeremias refers to this creed as, ‘the
earliest tradition of all,’ and Ulrich Wilckens says it ‘indubitably goes
back to the oldest phase of all in the history of primitive Christianity.’”
(p. 230) Thanks to Shelby Smith for pointing out this reference to me. BLG.
16Dr.
Robert L. Reymond, A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith,
(Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1998), p. 461f.
17Louw-Nida
Greek-English Lexicon - pro,qesij, ewj, h`
(1) a placing before, a setting forth,
presentation; idiomatically, in ref. to the sacred bread set out weekly
in the tabernacle or temple, oi` a;rtoi th/j proqe,sewj
lit. the bread of the
placing before, i.e. consecrated bread, loaves placed before God
(MT 12.4); (2) plan, purpose, design; of men (AC
11.23); of God (RO 8.28).
18Louw-Nida
Greek-English Lexicon.
19Benjamin
B. Warfield, The Plan of Salvation, (Avinger Texas: Simpson
Publishing Co., 1989), p. 6.
20Reymond,
p. 462.
22Clark
Pinnock and Brow, Unbounded Love; Pinnock, et. al., The Openness
of God; Richard Rice, Foreknowledge and Man’s Free Will; and John
Sanders The God Who Risks.
23John
Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, III. xxi. 3,4.
24A
side note: Many say that God predestined the Church as a people (corporately
and abstractly) but not the individuals in the Church. This is really an
attempt to make a difference without a distinction. How can one have a set
for which there is no sub-set? It is obviously illogical. You cannot have a
people predestined without having the individuals that make up that
people predestinated also. Practically, these references were not first
addressed to the corporate mystical body called the Church, but to
individual members gathered to hear Paul’s letters (as individuals) in the
churches of Rome and Ephesus. They were also written by an individual who
claimed to be individually predestined. The doctrine of predestination may
be extremely difficult for one to accept, but if it is the teaching of
Scripture one must put aside one’s human opinions and accept God’s Word.
25In
Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon -
qe,lhma,
atoj, to, gener., as the
result of what one has decided will; (1) objectively will, design,
purpose, what is willed; (a) used predominantly of what God has willed;
creation (RV 4.11); redemption (EP 1.5); callings (CO 1.9), etc.; (b) of
what a pers. intends to bring about by his own action purpose (LU
22.42);.
26In
Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon -
euvdoki,a, aj,h` gener.
what pleases; (1) of men; (a) as having good intent good will (PH
1.15); (b) as a feeling of strong emotion in favor of something, desire,
wish, good pleasure (RO 10.1); (2) of God good pleasure, favor,
approval (EP 1.5);.
27In
Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon -
proti,qhmi only mid. in the NT 2aor.
proeqe,mhn (1) put forward
publicly, present, offer (RO 3.25); (2) strictly, set before oneself; hence,
intend, purpose, plan (RO 1.13).
28In
Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon - boulh,
h/j, h` (1) as an inward
thought process leading toward a decision deliberation, motive (1C
4.5); (2) as the result of inner deliberation resolve, decision, purpose,
plan (AC 5.38); (3) as the result of community deliberation counsel
(AC 27.12); as the divine will counsel, purpose (AC 2.23).
|